Although the construct of trauma has largely eluded thorough behavior analysis, considerations surrounding trauma and trauma-informed care (TIC) have indubitably entered mainstream applied behavior analysis (ABA). In the absence of clear findings and guidance from a TIC research program, conversations surrounding the matter—which have permeated published literature, peer review, everyday practice interactions, and social media—have become polarizing. Some argue that ABA has not done enough to incorporate TIC, while others believe it is unnecessary or potentially harmful to the discipline. A third group remains skeptical, awaiting more data to reveal the utility (or lack thereof) of the TIC framework in ABA. This talk aims to bring clarity, vocabulary, and nuance to this timely discussion. I will begin by defining trauma from multiple levels of scientific understanding and providing a defensible behavior-analytic interpretation. Then, I will outline the core commitments of a TIC framework and describe how to incorporate them into ABA. Finally, I will address and respond to several concerns and questions that have arisen in the discourse surrounding trauma and TIC. The primary intention is to increase the audience's capacity and willingness to advocate for TIC in ABA, fostering better conversations and collaborations with colleagues, caregivers, and clients.